SNAP Benefits Unmet During Shutdown
Thirteen U.S. states sued the Trump administration on October 28, 2025. The lawsuit challenges the breakage of SNAP benefits during the ongoing government shutdown.
The suit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. It claims the move violates federal law. It also says the decision puts millions of low-income Americans at risk.
“This is about survival, not politics,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Shutdown Freezes Food Assistance
The shutdown began after Congress failed to pass a budget. The USDA paused SNAP payments, citing lack of funds.
Over 40 million Americans rely on SNAP. Many are now struggling to buy food.
“We don’t know how we’ll eat next week,” said a mother in Ohio.
States Say It’s Illegal
The lawsuit says the USDA broke the Food and Nutrition Act. That law requires uninterrupted food aid.
“This is reckless and unlawful,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta.
The states want an emergency court order to restart payments. They also want a full review of USDA’s actions.
White House Responds
The administration blamed Congress. It said it had no legal way to continue payments.
“We’re following the law. Congress must act,” said a White House spokesperson.
President Trump has not commented on the lawsuit. He has blamed Democrats for the budget deadlock.
Food Banks Overwhelmed
Food banks are seeing a surge. Feeding America reported a 30% rise in demand this week.
“We’re running out of supplies fast,” said a volunteer in Atlanta.
Some schools may cut lunch programs. Districts say they can’t cover the gap much longer.
Political Tensions Rise
Democratic governors say the move is cruel. They accuse the administration of using hunger as leverage.
“We won’t let our people starve,” said Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
Republicans back the administration. They say Democrats should agree to the budget.
What Happens Next
A judge will hear the case soon. If the court grants the injunction, SNAP payments could resume.
Legal experts say the case could set a precedent. It may define how benefits are handled in future shutdowns.
“This is a test of executive power,” said a law professor at Georgetown.
