Key Insights in Federal Government Contracting

The federal contracting landscape is shifting rapidly. Several major developments this week are shaping the industry. Here’s a look at the latest updates.

Harvard Contracts Under Review

The Trump administration has directed federal agencies to cancel contracts with Harvard University worth about $100 million. This move follows earlier cuts to research grants. The General Services Administration is assisting agencies in reviewing contracts for termination or transition.

FAR 2.0 Rollout Underway

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is undergoing a major overhaul. The FAR Council has released updates to streamline procurement processes and reduce regulatory burdens. Agencies are expected to issue class deviations within 30 days to align with the new framework.

DEI Standards and Legal Risks

Federal contractors are facing new compliance challenges. The Department of Justice has launched the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, targeting violations of civil rights laws under the False Claims Act. This shift follows the administration’s rejection of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.

Project Labor Agreement Injunction

A federal judge has blocked recent efforts to exempt certain construction projects from mandatory Project Labor Agreements (PLAs). The ruling means contractors must continue to comply with Biden-era PLA requirements for large-scale federal projects.

Contract Cuts Impact Consulting Industry

The administration is reviewing over 20,000 consulting agreements to identify “non-essential” contracts. This effort has already led to the termination of contracts worth billions. The move is causing uncertainty in the consulting sector, affecting hiring and operations.

📜 COMPLIANCE AND REGULATION UPDATES

Dealing with a canceled federal acquisition contract can feel like a wild rollercoaster ride. But choosing the right strategies can still make you come out whole! When the government pulls a full stop on your federal acquisition deal, remember you’re not outsmarting Uncle Sam. 

You’re more likely dipping into taxpayer pockets, including your own! Per FAR 49.109-7, the federal acquisition process limits recovery to costs that are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. So, before you bury the contracting officer in paperwork hoping to win big, take a breath. Those federal acquisition offices are often swamped, with officers juggling terminations like circus clowns. Flooding them with data might backfire! Instead, know your federal acquisition cancellation type—default, convenience, or settlement—and the difference between a settlement, equitable adjustment, or claim. Timing is everything in the federal acquisition game, so meet those deadlines and keep your cool to maximize your recovery without the drama.

Scott Investigations Protest Against DLA’s RFP

Scott Investigations & Research, LLC, from Omaha, Nebraska, threw a punch at the Department of Defense’s Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). 

Over RFP No. SPE3S1-24-R-0011 for water drinking pouches in a recent lively twist of procurement drama. Scott cried foul, arguing the procurement process was overly restrictive and lacked meaningful discussions. The agency, however, played by the book, setting a clear cut-off date for all offerors to submit revised proposals, as noted in the COS/MOL. Scott, expecting ongoing procurement talks, missed the memo that failure to revise meant evaluation on its original submission. This clear notice aligned with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) standards, as seen in OMNIPLEX World Servs. Corp. (2012). The procurement process, though firm, was fair, proving the DLA’s procurement strategy was no splash in the plan but a well-executed plan in the complex world of procurement.

Mastering Proposal Writing

Government contracting is not just about meeting qualifications – it’s about standing out. In a competitive field where agencies receive countless proposals, a contractor must craft a compelling, clear, and persuasive case. A well-written proposal is like a bridge that connects a company’s strengths to an agency’s needs. Those who master the art of proposal writing increase their chances of success.

Every agency has specific goals, challenges, and expectations. A winning proposal does not just present services – it directly addresses the agency’s pain points. To do this effectively, contractors must research the agency’s mission, past awards, and unmet needs. A proposal must speak to their priorities in plain, straightforward language. If an agency struggles with outdated technology, the contractor should show exactly how their solution modernizes operations.

Government proposals follow strict guidelines. A contractor may have the best solution, but if their proposal fails to meet basic requirements, it will be rejected. The Request for Proposal (RFP) serves as the rulebook. It outlines page limits, formatting instructions, evaluation criteria, and submission deadlines. A successful contractor reads every word of the RFP and follows it precisely. Even minor details – such as font sizes or document labeling – can affect how an evaluator perceives professionalism.

A proposal is not just a collection of technical details—it is a persuasive argument. The goal is to convince the agency that the contractor is the best choice. That means writing with clarity and purpose. Fancy words do not win contracts; clear, well-structured sentences do. A winning proposal combines simple, complex, and compound sentences to create a natural flow. It avoids jargon that may confuse the evaluator. Instead, it tells a story – one where the contractor’s solution resolves the agency’s concerns.Agencies do not just want promises – they want proof. A strong proposal provides solid evidence to support every claim. Contractors should include case studies that highlight successful past projects. Performance metrics, such as cost savings or efficiency improvements, help demonstrate real-world impact. If the proposal states that a system will reduce processing time by 30%, it should reference past results that prove this claim. Evaluators trust numbers more than vague assurances.

Pricing is a crucial factor in government contracting. Agencies look for the best value, not simply the lowest bid. A proposal must present pricing that is both competitive and reasonable. If costs are too low, the agency may question quality. If costs are too high, they may turn to another bidder. The best strategy is to provide a clear pricing breakdown that explains how the budget aligns with quality, efficiency, and risk management.

A proposal is an extension of a company’s brand. Just as a neatly ironed suit conveys professionalism, a clean, well-formatted document shows attention to detail. Spacing, bullet points, and headings should make information easy to navigate. Charts and tables help simplify complex data. Before submission, contractors must proofread carefully to eliminate typos or inconsistencies.

No project is without risks. Agencies appreciate contractors who plan ahead. A strong proposal does not ignore potential challenges – it addresses them. Whether it’s cybersecurity concerns, supply chain disruptions, or workforce training, contractors must outline how they will mitigate risks. Showing foresight builds confidence.

Proposal writing in government contracting is a skill that separates successful contractors from the rest. It requires research, precision, and strategic storytelling. Every sentence must serve a purpose. Every claim must have proof. Agencies do not just seek qualified vendors; they seek clarity, reliability, and strong value. A well-crafted proposal does not overwhelm the evaluator – it guides them smoothly toward an easy decision: awarding the contract.

LMI Wins Contract for DLA Support

Let’s be honest—government logistics doesn’t exactly scream excitement. But behind every mission, meal, and maintenance request in the military, there’s a lot of coordination. That’s where LMI comes in, and they’ve just landed a $9.4 million contract to help the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) streamline how it handles all that chaos.

Originally called the Logistics Management Institute, LMI was founded in 1961 to bring some order to government logistics. These days, they’re a full-blown consulting and tech company, based in Tyson’s, Virginia, helping federal agencies operate more efficiently using data, strategy, and a healthy dose of innovation. Picture a team of logistics pros and techies making spreadsheets cool—and useful. LMI isn’t just about logistics anymore. They’re deep into AI, cybersecurity, supply chain management, and helping the government modernize systems that, let’s face it, were probably built when floppy disks were high-tech. They’ve worked with almost every major federal agency, and they’re known for turning “too complicated to fix” problems into “already fixed, what’s next?”

With this $9.4M contract, LMI will support the Defense Logistics Agency’s Information Operations, specifically helping with interoperability and systems integration. That’s a fancy way of saying: they’re going to make sure all the tech and data systems DLA uses can talk to each other—and do it in a way that makes sense. They’ll also support the Defense Enterprise Data Standards Office (DEDSO), which is responsible for keeping all of DLA’s systems on the same page. Think of it like making sure every department in a massive company uses the same playbook—not one person using Excel while others using carrier pigeons.

Turns out, government logistics can be exciting—especially when there’s $9.4 million and a lot of techs involved.

GSA’s Expanding Role Boosts Procurement Efficiency

The General Services Administration (GSA) is perfectly placed to revolutionize procurement in the federal landscape. Potentially managing major IT contracts like NASA’s SEWP VI and NIH’s CIO-SP3, CIO-CS, and CIO-SP4, collectively worth over $100 billion. 

The change which was discussed in a recent GSA workforce town hall, aims to streamline procurement by centralizing governmentwide acquisition contracts (GWACs) under GSA’s umbrella. GSA is collaborating with the Office of Management and Budget, NASA, and NIH to transfer these contracts, ensuring minimal disruption for contractors like FCN, Inc. and Deloitte.The aim of this change is done keeping procurement efficiency as the goal.  By optimizing procurement processes, GSA could save tens of billions, aligning with President Trump’s March 2025 executive order to reduce contract duplication and enhance efficiency.

A New Era for IT Procurement

NASA’s SEWP VI which interestingly has a potential $60 billion value. They plan to expand to 1,000 prime contractors, offering standalone IT services and agency-specific storefronts. 

Meanwhile, NIH’s CIO-SP3, extended to April 2026, supports critical IT services for agencies like HHS and CISA. Despite delays from protests over CIO-SP4’s self-scoring methodology, GSA’s procurement oversight promises smoother operations. The agency’s OneGov strategy has already secured discounted software rates from Google, Adobe, and Salesforce, showcasing its procurement prowess. By rewriting Federal Acquisition Regulation and centralizing procurement functions, GSA is set to transform how the government buys IT solutions, impacting hundreds of contractors while driving significant cost savings. This bold move underscores GSA’s growing influence in federal procurement, paving the way for a more efficient, cost-effective future.

📢 Want to be featured in our next issue? [Submit Your Win Here]

🗣️ UPCOMING EVENTS

Event: Unleash the Power of Forensics Analysis with Deltek Acumen!
Date: May 28, 2025 11:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. ET

Event: Deltek ComputerEase in the Cloud: Embrace the Power of Cloud Technology
Date:  May 29, 2025 2:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time